Key Points
- Ujjain MP Anil Ferozia puts up clear notices at his office, refusing all requests for transfer and arms license recommendations.
- The move comes after a surge in requests following the implementation of Madhya Pradesh’s Transfer Policy-2025.
- Ferozia emphasizes that transfers and arms licenses are administrative matters, not political ones.
- He urges public representatives to set boundaries and focus on genuine public issues, not bureaucratic interventions.
- The decision aims to save citizens from unnecessary hassle and manage expectations realistically.
Ujjain: In a move that has surprised both the public and the political establishment of Madhya Pradesh, Ujjain-Alot MP Anil Ferozia has taken a firm stand against the growing trend of citizens seeking political intervention for administrative matters. He has put up two bold pamphlets at his Sethi Nagar office in Ujjain, explicitly stating: “Do not contact for transfer and arms license.”
Why This Step? The Story Behind the Notices
The catalyst for this decision was the recent implementation of the Transfer Policy-2025 by the Madhya Pradesh General Administration Department. The new policy led to a significant increase in people approaching Ferozia’s office for recommendation letters to support their transfer requests. Reports indicate that 10 to 20 people were visiting daily just to seek his endorsement for transfers.
Frustrated by the mounting pressure and determined to clarify his role, Ferozia installed clear information boards at his office. He explained that transfers are strictly administrative processes and not the responsibility of elected representatives.
“Transfer is not my job. This step is to save people from unnecessary trouble,” Ferozia stated.
Arms License Requests Also Off the Table
This is not the first time Anil Ferozia has drawn such boundaries. During his tenure as an MLA, he had already put up notices discouraging people from approaching him for arms license recommendations. He maintains that arms licensing is an administrative matter, and political interference is inappropriate.
Ferozia believes that if every public representative sets clear limits, the expectations of the public will also become more realistic and aligned with the actual duties of elected officials.
Public Convenience and Administrative Clarity
Ferozia’s decision is rooted in a desire to protect citizens from unnecessary inconvenience. He points out that policies like the transfer policy are time-bound and rule-based, making political recommendations both futile and misleading.
He urges his fellow public representatives to focus on solving genuine public problems rather than getting entangled in administrative recommendations.
A Message for Politicians and the Public
By taking this stand, Anil Ferozia is sending a strong message:
- Public representatives should respect administrative boundaries.
- Citizens should approach their leaders for real issues, not bureaucratic favors.
- Clear communication can help manage public expectations and build a healthier democracy.
MP Anil Ferozia’s refusal to entertain requests for transfer and arms license recommendations is a bold step towards transparent and responsible public service. His action not only aims to reduce public inconvenience but also sets an example for other politicians to focus on genuine governance rather than bureaucratic shortcuts.
