New Delhi: The Supreme Court has given a big order on the Gyanvapi case in Varanasi. The place where the court has claimed to be the Shivling should be protected. With this, he has refused to stop offering Namaz in the mosque. The court said that no one should be stopped from offering Namaz. Gyanvapi Masjid Commentary gave this order while hearing a petition filed against the order of the district court. The next hearing on the matter will be held on May 19.
The court said in its order, “The court will issue notice to the Supreme Court regarding this matter. Under which the District Magistrate of Varanasi will protect the place where the Shivling was found. With this, there will be no restriction on the people coming to the mosque for Najam, however, only 20 people can offer Namaz.
Help sought from Solicitor General
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Uttar Pradesh government in the Supreme Court on this matter, presented his side. During the hearing, the court said it needed their help on some issues. With this, Mehta said on the matter that, in the survey, Shivling has been found in Vajukhana, which is a place to wash hands and feet. The place of prayer is different.
Violation of the order of the lower court
Earlier, during the hearing in the Supreme Court, senior advocate Huzefa Ahmadi, appearing for Anjuman Intezamiya Masjid Committee, said that the prayers filed by the Hindu side in the Varanasi court clearly speak of changing the character of the structure. , which is a mosque.
He said that “The Varanasi Court on Monday ordered the sealing of a space in the premises after the commissioner pointed out that a Shivling was found inside the Gyanvapi Masjid premises.”
Advocate Huzefa said, “He is seeking a stay of all orders including the appointment of a commissioner of the trial court and status quo order should be ordered as these orders are illegal and against the law of Parliament.” He said, “The premises cannot remain sealed and the orders are illegal. If the premises are sealed, the status quo changes. Section 3 of the Places of Worship Act makes it clear that this cannot be done.”
